41 User(s) làđọc chủ đề này 30 phút vừa qua
0Thành viên41 Khách
0Thành viên41 Khách
Dân số hiện tại:
1.6 reward campaing (51 Người chơi)
CBA PathBlood 1.8.0 (48 Người chơi)
AoKTS updates (43 Người chơi)
Word Association (42 Người chơi)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (39 Người chơi)
#ReviveCS - Proposal (37 Người chơi)
New Voobly Client 2.7 (31 Người chơi)
Chủ đề tích cực nhất tuần qua:
#ReviveCS - Proposal (44 Bài viết)
New CBA Hero now supports HD / D... (8 Bài viết)
my version shows as 1.0C and oth... (7 Bài viết)
Voobly disappearing without erro... (7 Bài viết)
AYUDA!! LOST CONNECTION TO THE S... (6 Bài viết)
Why are rathas ranged units? (4 Bài viết)
1.6 Out of sync without any play... (4 Bài viết)
circumstantial -> tardiness
Dependent was the most recent participant word.
Singular
(A matrix is singular iff its rows/columns are linearly dependent)
Obviously you're correct in that something circumstantial is dependent on different things but that's step three. Something needs to be circumstantial before we can say the word dependent. I thought about this before I wrote that. I should've wrote directly related above.
Obviously you're correct in that something circumstantial is dependent on different things but that's step three. Something needs to be circumstantial before we can say the word dependent. I thought about this before I wrote that. I should've wrote directly related above.
I already stated above that something that's circumstantial is dependent but this is after the fact. First, imo, something that is circumstantial needs to be specified in order for the word dependent to be put into play. And you can't say the word dependent at any time... not if it's been said recently per the rules you made in the original post. I think the main issue I'm having is that they're both adjectives and shouldn't directly lead to each other like I said before.
particular
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
At any rate, for the sake of keeping this moving, I will accept particular.
Existence
I'm not sure how this thread will ever end...
I'm used to cause and effect.... not cause, effect, and back to cause.
(e.g. AB -> A + B compared to AB -> A + B -> C ... where C would be another reactant not directly related to A and B other than it being another subject/noun/group/adjective...)